More Glock Models Rumored for California as DOJ Lawsuit Faces New Developments

The recent addition of the Glock 43XCA to California's handgun roster has sparked speculation that additional Glock models could soon become available in the state. At the same time, new court filings in United States v. California could influence the federal government's ongoing challenge to California's handgun roster and Assembly Bill 1127.

While the Glock 43XCA's roster approval is confirmed, reports suggesting that the Glock 17, Glock 19, and Glock 45 will follow remain unverified.

Rumors of Three Additional Glock Models

The speculation began with an October 6 social media post from North County Shooting Center in San Marcos, California. The business indicated that three additional Glock models were expected but stated that specific SKUs and product details were still pending.

The original announcement did not identify which models were coming. After the post circulated on Reddit and other platforms, speculation began focusing on the Glock 17, Glock 19, and Glock 45. However, there has been no confirmed announcement identifying these models or establishing when they might become available.

The Glock 43XCA's addition is particularly significant because it represents a California-specific version designed to satisfy the state's handgun roster requirements, including a magazine disconnect and loaded chamber indicator. Whether Glock intends to introduce additional California-compliant models remains uncertain.

California Introduces New Evidence in Federal Lawsuit

Meanwhile, the federal lawsuit United States v. California continues to challenge California's handgun roster and AB 1127, legislation addressing certain semiautomatic pistols.

On September 30, California submitted a notice of new evidence highlighting recent additions to the state's handgun roster. According to the filing described in the report, 34 handgun models had been added to the roster since September 3, with 31 featuring magazine disconnect mechanisms and loaded chamber indicators. California also specifically referenced the addition of the Glock 43XCA.

The state's filing appears intended to demonstrate that manufacturers can continue introducing compliant handguns despite the challenged regulations. This evidence could become relevant as the court considers the federal government's request to block enforcement of certain restrictions. However, the addition of compliant firearms does not automatically resolve the constitutional questions raised by the lawsuit.

Court Hearing Delayed Until January

Another development involves the scheduling of proceedings in United States v. California.

A hearing previously expected in October has reportedly been moved to January 2027. The reason for the change has not been confirmed in the supplied report, although the timing follows California's submission of additional evidence. The delay means the federal government's challenge to the roster and AB 1127 will remain unresolved for at least several more months.

What Comes Next for California Gun Owners?

Two important questions remain unanswered.

First, whether Glock will officially introduce additional California-compliant pistols beyond the 43XCA. Until specific models are confirmed through manufacturer announcements or official roster listings, reports identifying the Glock 17, 19, and 45 should be treated as speculation.

Second, whether California's recent roster additions will affect the outcome of United States v. California.

The federal government continues to challenge the state's firearm restrictions, while California is presenting evidence that manufacturers can comply with its regulatory requirements. The addition of the Glock 43XCA represents a notable development for California's handgun market, but the broader legal battle over the roster and AB 1127 remains unresolved.